ISMP Quarterly Action
Agenda: July - September, 2000
Click here for printer friendly version
From the October 4, 2000 issue
One of the most important methods for preventing adverse
drug events is for organizations to be proactive by seeking
and using knowledge from other organizations that have already
experienced problems. To make a significant impact on error
prevention efforts, administrative staff and an interdisciplinary
committee at each practice site should review the following
agenda to prompt discussion, and then take the necessary action
to minimize adverse drug events in their facility. The following
selected items appeared in the ISMP Medication Safety Alert!
between July - September 2000. Each item includes a description
of the problem, recommendations for safe medication practices,
and the issue number (in parentheses) to locate additional
information. The American Society of Health Care Risk Management
(ASHRM) provides the ISMP Quarterly Action Agenda to all its
members. A list of agenda items is also posted on our web
site (www.ismp.org). In many cases, product-related problems
can be visualized in the ISMP Medication Safety Alert! section
of our web site. Continuing Pharmaceutical Education is available
for the Action Agenda on our web site (www.ismp.org).
I. Look-alike/sound-alike drug names, ambiguous or
look-alike labeling and packaging
- PROSTIN 15 (carboprost tromethamine, HEMABATE),
PROSTIN E2 (dinoprostone, prostaglandin E2), and
PROSTIN VR Pediatric (alprostadil, prostaglandin E1) (16)
Problem: Confusion surrounds prostaglandin products
when referred to as "Prostin." PROSTIN E2 is a vaginal suppository
used to induce labor, treat uterine bleeding and atony,
and as an abortifacient. In some European and Scandinavian
countries, carboprost tromethamine is known as PROSTIN
15. In the U.S., it's called HEMABATE and used
for postpartum bleeding. PROSTIN VR Pediatric is
used to maintain patency of ductus arteriosus and is available
in 500 mcg ampuls of 1 mL, exactly double the amount available
with HEMABATE. Recommendation: Order prostaglandin
products using both the generic and brand name. Include
"Pediatric" in the brand name field for Prostin VR. Pharmacists
should also be aware of the patient's condition and indication
for use of a prostaglandin.
- SARAFEM (fluoxetine) and SEROPHENE (clomiphene
citrate) (17)
Problem: Verbal orders for these two drugs could
be confused. Sarafem, a new trademark for fluoxetine approved
for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), is available
in 10 and 20 mg capsules. Serophene is a 50 mg tablet used
to treat ovulatory failure.
Recommendation: Encourage prescribers to include
the drug's purpose on prescriptions. Alert patients and
caregivers to the potential for confusion between these
drugs. When receiving telephone orders, repeat the drug
name and spell it back to the prescriber.
- RETROVIR (zidovudine) and ritonavir (NORVIR)
(9)
Problem: Three pharmacies recently reported dispensing errors
with Retrovir and ritonavir. Two patients developed potentially
life-threatening anemias after receiving Retrovir instead
of ritonavir. Although dosages are somewhat different, both
are available in a 100 mg capsule, which increases the risk
of confusion. Similar cases have been reported in the past.
Recommendation: Prescribers should use both brand and generic
names when prescribing these drugs and the names should
be printed. Store the products separately and apply warning
labels to prevent product misidentification. Alerts in the
pharmacy computer system are also helpful.
- pancuronium and enalaprilat (19)
Problem: Baxter's vials of pancuronium, a paralyzing
agent, and enalaprilat, an antihypertensive, look dangerously
similar in appearance. A fatality might occur if pancuronium
is given accidentally to a patient who is not mechanically
ventilated. Recommendation: Until label changes occur,
obtain one of the products from a different manufacturer
to make its appearance dissimilar. If this is not possible,
separate the storage of these drugs and apply a warning,
"paralyzing agent," on pancuronium vials.
- AVANDIA (rosiglitazone) and COUMADIN (warfarin);
TEGRETOL (carbamazepine) and TEQUIN (gatifloxacin)
(15)
Problem: It's easy to confuse newer drugs on the
market with older, more familiar drugs when their names
are similar. Poorly written orders for the new anti-diabetic,
Avandia, have been misread as Coumadin. Both are available
as 4 mg oral tablets. Familiarity with the word "equine"invites
mispronunciation/misspelling of the new drug, "Tequin" with
an "E" at the end of the name, which when scripted, can
look like the "L" in Tegretol. Again, overlapping available
dosage strengths (200 and 400 mg tablets) make errors more
likely. Recommendation: Knowing the patient's diagnoses
can help prevent these errors. Thus, nurses and pharmacists
should always match the purpose of the drug with the patient's
diagnoses before dispensing or administering these drugs.
When possible, prescriptions should include the medication's
purpose. Using reminders on drug containers and building
alerts in computer systems may also be helpful.
II. Discussion Items
- Pharmacists' review of orders prior to administration
(15)
Problem: It's risky to remove non-critical first
doses and other routine medications from floor stock or
automated dispensing cabinets if drug administration can
safely wait until a pharmacist is able to review and screen
the order first.
Recommendation: Safeguards must be established for
the storage, removal, and administration of drugs available
in automated and non-automated floor stock. A clear process
is needed to determine when an urgent situation would necessitate
the administration of a drug stored in patient care units
before pharmacy order review. Stock must be carefully selected
and provided in limited quantities, single concentrations,
and in unit doses. Drugs obtained from stock before pharmacy
review should be independently double-checked by a second
practitioner before administration. Timely order verification
and minimal turnaround time is needed to avoid unnecessary
use of floor stock.
- Use of fibrinolytics to treat acute myocardial infarction
(19)
Problem: When using fibrinolytics and related therapy,
any deviation in the dose, timing, or use of specific agents
could adversely affect the patient's outcome. Several reported
errors demonstrate that complex regimens and variations
in the way the drugs are dosed and administered increase
the chance of serious errors, especially when multiple products
are on the formulary and protocols are absent or poorly
designed.
Recommendation: Limit fibrinolytic agents on the
formulary. Use streamlined protocols and standardized order
forms to promote proper use. Refer to tissue plasminogen
activators by their full generic names, not "t-PA." Simplify
the treatment regimen while considering all the associated
drugs that may be used and the tight time constraints for
administration. Make sure protocols clearly note that a
heparin infusion should not be started if a low molecular
weight heparin has just been administered. Educate physicians,
pharmacists, and nurses when adding new fibrinolytics to
the formulary. If possible, have pharmacy dispense fibrinolytics,
especially if mixing is necessary. Otherwise, limit the
number of doses available in patient care areas.
- Documentation of a patient's adverse drug reactions
(ADRs) (18)
Problem: Information about ADRs are typically buried
within the medical record, poorly visible and difficult
to access for all who provide care to the patient. A patient
who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a critical
care unit had her IV line flushed with heparin after being
transferred to a medical unit because the ADR information
was not readily available to staff.
Recommendation: In addition to documenting ADRs in
progress notes, physicians should communicate them in a
standardized fashion such as writing them on an order form,
similar to prescribing therapy. This quickly communicates
the information to nurses and pharmacists and allows them
to enter it in appropriate interactive fields in the computer
system and in other nursing and pharmacy records. It also
facilitates timely discontinuation of the drug suspected
to cause an ADR.
- Problems with automatic stop orders (16)
Problem: Automatic stop orders may lack specificity
and fail to consider "exceptions to the rule" for designated
drugs and indications. Examples include warfarin for atrial
fibrillation, enoxaparin in patients awaiting cardiac surgery,
and phenobarbital for epilepsy. Problems result if orders
for these drugs are automatically discontinued by the computer
system without warning
Recommendation: After reviewing your state regulations,
evaluate the need to continue enforcing automatic stop policies.
If the policy is necessary, identify "exceptions" (e.g.,
warfarin for atrial fibrillation) and exclude them from
the policy. To prevent unintended discontinuation of drugs,
encourage prescribers to include the drug's indication and
duration and incorporate the duration of drug therapy in
diagnosis-specific protocols/standardized orders. Configure
computer systems so drugs governed by automatic stop orders
are not discontinued without notice.
- Electromagnetic interference (EMI) with the operation
of mechanical device (19)
Problem: In theory, it's been purported that EMI
from cellular phones can affect the proper operation of
mechanical devices. Now, an epinephrine overdose has been
reported in which a cellular phone in the "standby" mode
caused an infusion pump to deliver an unintended bolus dose.
Recommendation: Ban the use of visitor cellular phones
in healthcare facilities or enforce strict guidelines for
their safe use.
- Joint Commission
(JC) releases draft patient safety standards (18)
JC has issued draft standards that support patient safety.
A few of the many important standards include: 1) designating
one or more qualified individuals to manage the organization-wide
patient safety program; 2) clear expectations for internal
and external reporting of error information; 3) mechanisms
to support staff members who have been involved in a sentinel
event; and 4) an annual report to the governing body on
actions taken to improve safety.
|
|